Cash For Clunkers? Good Riddance!
Written by Matthew C. Keegan // 02/18/2009 // Campus Cars // 6 Comments
President Obama quickly signed into law what is billed as “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act” a $787 billion package which he hopes will help stimulate the economy. That bill, however, includes many different projects well beyond the stimulative including specific pork induced items which will expand the roll of the federal government.
Left out of the bill is a provision that could have brought about a trade war or at the very least presented an unforeseen hardship for college students.
And what might that be? A “cash for clunkers” car buy back program, one that would have paid people money to turn in their old cars.
On the surface, the “cash for clunkers” program could have been something worthwhile as it would have:
- Given a $10,000 credit to low and moderate income consumers who traded in a car or truck that was at least ten years old.
- In exchange for the trade in credit, buyers would be required to purchase any new vehicle that was proven to be more fuel efficient as well as assembled in the United States.
- The vehicles traded in would be scrapped instead of resold.
But, there were several problems with the bill, issues which would have impacted consumers and our country in ways not originally considered including:
- Such a provision would violate trade agreements with other countries. Some of the vehicles popular with Americans are built overseas and would not be eligible. Even cars and trucks built by our trade partners in Canada or Mexico would not be included in the program, undermining NAFTA.
- Had the provision been included with the bill, a segment of the car buying public would have found it more difficult to afford a used car. Millions of college students rely on older vehicles to get themselves around; a limited availability of the same would have driven up prices for used cars.
College students are among the most environmentally conscious people, but they understand the ramifications that such a program could have on world trade as well as on their wallets. Many campuses across the country are only accessible via personal transportation, thus a ready supply of low cost used cars is necessary for them.
Some sort of cash for clunkers program will likely emerge over the coming months or years, both as a stimulative measure to get people to buy a new car and as an environmental measure to move off of the road less fuel efficient and higher polluting vehicles.
Adv. — Whether you drive a clunker or class act, your car needs regular maintenance to keep it running smoothly. Please visit Saylowerbills.com to find out how you can lower your transportation costs.





If you want to contribute tutorials, news or other college-related stuff:
Share our college magazine with your facebook friends and campus colleagues:
Attention Bloggers - follow us on where bloggers meet:
Do you have any ideas or suggestions you would like to make?
If you like what we do, please subscribe to our
All content Copyright © 2011 SayCampusLife. Part of nBuy Education Network.
6 Comments on "Cash For Clunkers? Good Riddance!"
I drive a ’89 Toyota Celica and a ’93 Ford festiva, both cars get over 40mpg, both carry very cheap insurance and taxes, both cost less than $500 when purchased a few years back.
How in the world would someone see it more environmentally feasible to crush those cars and buy a new $35,000+ 30mpg hybrid?
Because their school of thought is that your cars are melting the polar ice caps forcing some poor, carnivorous polar bear to become separated from his snow hare dinner. Besides, that toaster on wheels will help stimulate the economy if you buy one now. Too bad you’ll never recover the cost of owning one!
Had the program pushed through, It think it would be alright. However, I think an alternative to the program is a similar one, where you get to upgrade from old “dirty” fuel to a more cleaner one.
Imees last blog post..2009 Nissan Altima Hybrid
Imee, so what you are saying is that if the program had people selling their gas powered cars and trading it in for a hybrid or electric car, then that would be the better plan to use? Well, if they do it that way then they need to come up with a larger credit. Despite getting 41 mpg around town, the hybrid Fusion is not worth the $8000 premium over the standard model. Even with a federal tax credit of I believe $3400, it’ll take years to make up the $4600 differential.
Trackbacks for this post