Word that the city of Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania) is proposing charging a tax on college tuition has been met with criticism as students, parents and local colleges and universities voice their opposition to the plan. The tax, which would be applied to tuition only would help the city fund its pension obligations, raising some $16.2 million annually according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Services Fee

If the mayor of Pittsburgh has his way, college students will be shelling out a wad of tuition tax money every year.
Mayor Luke Ravensthal defends the city’s move as Pittsburgh provides what they say is “free” police and fire protection to students as well as building inspectors who ensure that campus classrooms, libraries, administrative buildings and dormitories are kept safe.
This means that everyone from community college and tech schools to the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon would be taxed. The schools would be responsible for collecting the extra 1% charge from their students and forwarding those funds to the city. The Post-Gazette says that the tuition tax would translate into a $20 hit for community college students, but as much as $403 for Carnegie-Mellon enrollees.
Questionable Fees
Mayor Ravenstahl also took issue with schools who are already charging students a myriad number of “questionable fees” for orientation, safety, security and other services, implying that parents should go after the schools themselves to reduce these costs. The mayor’s implication appears to be that some of those fees should be dropped to pave the way for the tuition tax.
The University of Pittsburgh, Duquesne University, and Carnegie-Mellon University are among the largest of the colleges and universities found within Pittsburgh city limits and have expressed some of the strongest opposition to the mayor’s proposal.
Duquesne President Responds
Charles J. Dougherty, president of Duquesne University subsequently issued a statement noting that Ravenstahl identified affordability as one of the primary barriers to college access in a December 2006 news release. Mr. Dougherty even went so far as calling the mayor’s proposal illegal, citing a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court which struck down a similar measure.
According to Mr. Dougherty, “The Mayor’s proposal places the burden of balancing the City budget on the backs of college students. This will weaken Pittsburgh’s credibility as a progressive place to live and work, further hindering community and economic development efforts. As Duquesne and other local institutions work to recruit the best and brightest students to Pittsburgh, this tax will serve as a competitive disadvantage when prospective students compare us to universities in cities that do not impose such a tax. As the city continues to lose population and struggles to retain young adults as residents, it would be extremely shortsighted to create a disincentive for students to come to Pittsburgh colleges and universities.”
All ten schools represented by the Pittsburgh Council on Higher Education have joined together to oppose the mayor’s plan.
Photo Credit: Keith Syvinski
Adv. — Not sure what to get your brother or sister for Christmas this year? Lots of good finds on nBuy Plaza, your online shopping source for all things Christmas!
Tags: Charles J. Dougherty, Duquesne University, Luke Ravensthal, Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, tuition tax


Charge Local Use Fees? Bad Idea!
April 26th, 2010 by Matthew C. Keegan | No Comments | Filed in CommentaryCash strapped communities are looking at ways to close budget gaps without burdening taxpayers with yet another tax increase. Taxpayers are still reeling from a down economy and any increase in taxes is likely to encounter fierce resistance.
User Fees
What I’m talking about are proposed user fees charged by communities based on enrollment. Last November, SayCampusLife.com noted that Pittsburgh’s mayor, Luke Ravensthal, proposed charging a tax on college tuition. That tax was offered as a way for the Steel City to fund its pension obligation. The mayor reasoned that since colleges and universities scattered across his city use city services such as fire, police and emergency medical responders, they should help cover these costs.
As expected, opposition to Ravensthal’s plan was universal, with each school denouncing the proposal. Soon thereafter The Pittsburgh Channel reported that the mayor’s proposed one percent tax on college tuition was rejected by the city’s Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority, not so much because it was a bad idea, rather because Ravensthal’s tax would have been deemed illegal or unenforceable.
Caldwell College
Pittsburgh isn’t the only place thinking about charging its college students. The Star-Ledger has reported that the town of Caldwell, New Jersey is considering a similar plan for its namesake Caldwell College, a small, Catholic institution occupying 70 acres of land in the midst of this Essex County community.
Like Pittsburgh, Caldwell has a budget gap to close, in this case a tiny $180,000 deficit. The town doesn’t want to raise taxes on its 7400 residents, but they don’t seem to be exploring other options such as cutting expenditures. Instead, councilman Joe Norton, chairman of the town’s budget committee has proposed charging students a fee each semester: $25 for part-time and $50 for full-time students.
Exploring Options
Though it is understandable for communities to want schools who use their resources to pay their “fair share” of services rendered, our elected leaders are failing to understand the significant contributions these schools make to their communities. Lots of local businesses such as coffee shops, clothing stores, and food outlets located near campus reap the benefit of having students as their customers and should be surveyed or at least observed for student traffic. I also like to think that home values are positively impacted whenever a college is located nearby; who can put a price on that?
Typically, cash strapped communities include cities known to spend more money than they take in or communities whose workforces are highly paid. Instead of dumping yet another expense on financially strapped college students, towns would serve everyone better if they trimmed the fat and lived within their means. New Jersey’s governor, Chris Christie is doing that at the state level—it is time for the Garden State’s 566 communities to follow suit.
Too often a tax increase is looked at as a way to resolve a problem. Instead, cutting expenses and forging interlocal agreements can save far more money while enabling communities to operate in the black year after year.
Tags: Caldwell, Caldwell College, Chris Christie, city services, New Jersey, Pittsburgh, The Pittsburgh Channel, The Star-Ledger, tuition tax, use fees